Abortion Debate
|
Over the course of the history of abortion, induced abortions have been a source of considerable debate and controversy regarding the morality and legality of this practice. An individual's position on the complex ethical, moral, philosophical, biological, and legal issues have a strong relationship with that individual's value system. A person's position on abortion may be best described as a combination of their personal beliefs on the morality of abortion, and that person's beliefs on the ethical scope and responsibility of legitimate governmental and legal authority. Another factor for many individuals is religious doctrine.
Abortion debates, especially pertaining to abortion laws, are often spearheaded by advocacy groups belonging to one of two camps. Most often those in favor of legal prohibition of abortion describe themselves as pro-life while those against legal restrictions on abortion describe themselves as pro-choice. Both are used to indicate the central principles in arguments for and against abortion: "Is the fetus a human being with a fundamental right to life?" for pro-life advocates, and, for those who are pro-choice, "Does a woman have the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion?"
In both public and private debate, arguments presented in favor of or against abortion focus on either the moral permissibility of an induced abortion, or justification of laws permitting or restricting abortion. Arguments on morality and legality tend to collide and combine, complicating the issue at hand.
Debate also focuses on whether the pregnant woman should have to notify and/or have the consent of others in distinct cases: a minor her parents; a legally-married or common-law wife her husband; or a pregnant woman the biological father. In a 2003 Gallup poll in the United States, 72% of respondents were in favor of spousal notification, with 26% opposed; of those polled, 79% of males and 67% of females responded in favor.
Public opinion
Political sides have largely been divided into absolutes. The abortion debate, as such, tends to center around individuals who hold strong positions. However, public opinion varies from poll to poll, country to country, and region to region:
- Australia: In a February 2005 AC Nielsen poll, as reported in The Age, 56% thought the current abortion laws, which generally allow abortion for the sake of life or health, were "about right," 16% want changes in law to make abortion "more accessible," and 17% want changes to make it "less accessible."A 1998 poll, conducted by Roy Morgan Research, asked, "Do you approve of the termination of unwanted pregnancies through surgical abortion?" 65% of the Australians polled stated that they approved of surgical abortion and 25% stated that they disapproved of it.
- Canada: A recent poll of Canadians, conducted in April 2005 by Gallup, found that 52% of those polled want abortion laws to "remain the same," 20% want the laws to be "less strict," and 24% would prefer that the laws become "more strict." An earlier Gallup poll, from December 2001, asked, "Do you think abortions should be legal under any circumstances, legal only under certain circumstances or illegal in all circumstances and in what circumstances?" 32% of Canadians responded that they believe abortion should be legal in all circumstance, 52% that it should be legal in certain circumstances, and 14% that it should be legal in no circumstances. Canada currently has no laws restricting abortion.
- Ireland: A 1997 Irish Times/MRBI poll of the Republic of Ireland's electorate found that 18% believe that abortion should never be permitted, 35% that one should be allowed in the event that the woman's life is threatened, 18% if her health is at risk, 28% that "an abortion should be provided to those who need it," and 5% were undecided.
- The United Kingdom: An online YouGov/Daily Telegraph poll in August 2005 found that 30% of Britons would back a measure to reduce the legal limit for abortion to 20 weeks, 19% support a limit of 12 weeks, 9% support a limit of less than 12 weeks, and 25% support maintaining the current limit of 24 weeks. 6% responded that abortion should never be allowed while 2% said it should be permitted throughout the entirety of pregnancy.
- The United States: In a January 2006 CBS News poll, which asked, "What is your personal feeling about abortion?", 27% said that abortion should be "permitted in all cases," 15% that it should be "permitted, but subject to greater restrictions than it is now," 33% said that it should be "permitted only in cases such as rape, incest or to save the woman's life," 17% said that it should "only be permitted to save the woman's life," and 5% said that it should "never" be permitted. A November 2005 Pew Research Center poll asked "In 1973 the Roe versus Wade decision established a woman's constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy. Would you like to see the Supreme Court completely overturn its Roe versus Wade decision, or not?", with 29% indicating they want it overturned, and 65% that they do not.
|
abortion , abortion clinics , abortion in canada , abortion clinic , abortion statistics , abortion canada , abortion laws , abortion pill , anti abortion , against abortion , abortion facts , pro abortion , for abortion , abortion law , abortion rights , post abortion , partial birth abortion , canadian abortion , about abortion , after abortion , abortion pictures , abortion procedure , abortion information , abortion debate , abortion rates , teen abortion , medical abortion , abortion breast cancer , abortion laws in canada , abortion clinics toronto , views on abortion , effects of abortion , abortion pro choice , history of abortion , abortion services , abortion articles , abortion arguments , therapeutic abortion , abortion methods , abortion procedures , abortion cost , what is abortion , spontaneous abortion , abortion clinics in toronto , toronto abortion , abortion ontario , abortion costs , abortion rate , abortion stats , abortion history , abortion in ontario , pros and cons of abortion , abortion essay , reasons for abortion , abortion pro life , missed abortion , abortion law in canada , canadian abortion statistics , legal abortion , abortion pros and cons , abortion is wrong , induced abortion , abortion poems , abortion pros , cons of abortion , abortion essays , abortion cases , canadian abortion laws , articles on abortion , abortion issues , abortion statistics canada , teenage abortion , abortion pills , abortion clinics ontario , facts about abortion , types of abortion , gender selective abortion , abortion article , cost of abortion , abortion stories , abortion vancouver , abortion options , post abortion syndrome , abortion statistics in canada , abortion videos , abortion info , calgary abortion , abortion clinics canada , canadian abortion law , selective abortion , abortion quotes , abortion definition , facts on abortion , herbal abortion , abortion process , abortion risks , abortion pics , ottawa abortion , information on abortion , methods of abortion, miscarriage , abortions , aborted , parenthood , miscarriages , avortement , ru486 , cytotec , abort , abortus , legalized , unborn , pro life , partial birth , choice , morgentaler , prochoice , prolife , abortionist , morally , partial birth abortions , right to life , clinics , late term , roe vs wade , obortion , ru 486 , infanticide , vacuum aspiration , abortionists , mary anne warren , nuremberg files , birth control , euthanasia , morning after pill , roe v wade , teen pregnancy , personhood , planned parenthood , operation rescue , parental consent , mifepristone , wrong , lifers , global gag rule , randall terry , pill , project rachel , ensoulment , birth control pill , life dynamics , postabortion , contraceptives , abortifacient , mifeprex , naral , fetus , margaret sanger , alan guttmacher institute , teenage pregnancy
|
|
 |